

Agreed, but….my Hilux?
Agreed, but….my Hilux?
Sound like huge wins to me.
What kind of job are you looking for?
The hats keep us safe from space laser targeting; how dare you question them!
I doubt this is the place. I get shredded when I talk about Apple products here. (Shredding commencing in three…two…)
Honestly pretty great. I love my relatively new position at my company, my career track is great, and it seems like people above me might be aware of the good job I am doing. Plus it’s more money than I have ever made in my life, so while I’m still underpaid for my role, I get to WFH wherever I want, and this has all allowed me to buy my first house in rural northern Maine, with almost 11 acres. I close in 27 days and then I can GTFO of my parents’ house, where I have been for 15 months. With any luck I can then find a Canadian wife and get dual citizenship, the better to flee when the trump gestapo come for me for whatever made up reason they come up with.
Thanks, brutalism. 🙄
Yes. For people who consider groups of many things to be one thing. Like known individual human Ted Cruz, for example
Are the accounts tied to real human people?
Maybe he shouldn’t have bought a fucking cybertruck 🤷♂️
Maybe I can finally get the Toyota Hilux I always wanted! But seriously, everyone in the US stop buying shit that isn’t strictly necessary. The corporations cannot “pass the costs along” to us if we don’t buy their shit. Obviously it’s not optimal, but there’s no reason to take it up the caboose just because.
So you are saying that by NOT transporting these goods whatsoever, the environment is harmed more?
If they were not above the law, then this would have been a criminal prosecution of Google executives that would not be escapable via large payoffs.
This is a very weird thing to post unless you are courting controversy and attention?
So you are saying container ships do not cause massive pollution?
EDIT: For the argumentative kids in the class who still don’t get it: It doesn’t matter if container ships are the best way or the worst way. That’s irrelevant to my comment. If an element of pollution is removed, then pollution goes down.
Hey friend. Calling the Venera probes “junk” is selling them short. The Soviet Venus program pulled off some genuinely insane feats between the ’60s and early ’80s—basically the punch-card era of spaceflight.
All of this was done with computers running at 100–200 kHz and 8 KB of memory. For comparison, modern smartphones have 3–6 GB of RAM, multi-core CPUs clocking in at 2.5+ GHz, and literally millions of times the processing power. Your phone wouldn’t last five seconds on Venus. Venera 13 lasted 127 minutes.
Despite the harshest planetary environment we’ve ever targeted—900°F surface temps, atmospheric pressure like 3,000 feet underwater, and clouds of sulfuric fucking acid—the Venera program still racked up a list of milestones:
Here’s how their success rate compares to other space programs:
SpaceX has incredible reliability, but they’re launching commsats and resupply capsules—not trying to drop hardware onto a planet that eats spacecraft for breakfast. NASA has never returned data from the surface of Venus, despite multiple attempts. Mars is a far easier target in every possible way, and it still took decades to achieve consistent success.
Venera’s 54% success rate wasn’t a sign of failure—it was a sign of pushing the boundaries of what was possible. They were first. They were bold. And they made history with kilobyte-level hardware and pressure vessels tougher than your car’s engine block.
This wasn’t junk. It was triumph.
Visual and audio proof: