So let’s start with a hypothetical scenario. (I know strawman, but we’re talking about meta levels of philosophy here and experiments like these usually serve very well to prove a point or contradiction in someone’s logic)
If there is a serial killer who can never be satisfied and can escape any sort of containment given enough time. Is it wrong to execute them?
Wonder if this will be the final form of Tank Top Master.
Much higher than the sun, unless you’re also adding the pressure of a star.
🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱
It might even be… Revolutionary
I see you are uninitiated. Let me illuminate you with some wisdom of yore.
Oh
My
God
This is awesome
Down vote cause no arch. (no I didn’t.)
But in all seriousness, don’t use arch as a Linux noob.
Personally I prefer the “personal PIN number” and “Automatic ATM machine” you don’t want to use a manual ATM machine, those suck.
Because she is a different being than the being that was defeated.
She’s still a little bitch.
Ok, but why an otter?
I’m not. I’m looking at Lemmy, I’m just subbed to the community so it appears on my front page.
I think the longest time would probably be around 12 hours (24 was just me being conservative about it)
Thinking of a race that actually happens on Saturday and you can only watch it on Sunday.
Also I think you’re on to something there, if we say: hey just on Sundays, don’t post spoilers in the title and if you’re posting a spoiler image mark it nsfw so it gets blurred out.
There’s even a community :) https://lemmy.world/c/factorio
This reminds me of Hydra’s “Compliance will be rewarded”
I’d expect there to be a safety margin of “it closes after the end of the drs zone” if it triggers automatically you’re not only going to get a bad lap time cause you closed it too late and you’re likely to slide a bit at the next turn but you could also potentially get a warning the first time and a time penalty the second time.
Ya think they’ll stop buying property in the US for profit?
"I’m not the sharpest crayon in the basket. "
“Does the pope shit in the woods?”
I really like this response. This is how I approach it as well on a higher level.
However here we seemed to have glossed over “what is right and wrong” which is a very complex issue and might be biased by the observer.
Hobbes has touched on this subject and the whole construct of society as we know it in his book “The Leviathan”
What we might see as wrong in the case of the killer and their victims, on his end is just an expression of his free will. In his mind he might not be doing anything wrong, given different guidelines for moral or empathy. In fact he may not even consider his victims alive.
So we judge them based on our morals and views of good and evil. Are we correct or are they correct? Hobbes states that the morals of the majority are what we follow in a society. But it’s just something that we’ve constructed.
Edit: once again I’m using a case in where the situation is very obvious and clear cut. But think about when there is more nuance. A society views a certain race or species as a food source or livestock (think us and cows, or us and farmed fish) Are we correct or are we wrong to do what we do?